Some employees remain employed by the same company for a number of years or even decades at a time. Is this an indication of faithfulness or slothfulness?
enure at a job is crucial for appealing to future employers – this is the story that predominates in the workforce, despite the fact that many workers frequently change jobs and have for years. This is the case despite the fact that many workers have for years. However, some workers are concerned about quitting their jobs before they have been there for at least a year or even longer. They are afraid that recruiters will reprimand them for not being able to remain committed to a role, or even judge them as someone who is unable to maintain a position.
It is not surprising that the traditional “company man” is still held in high regard. This refers to a someone who has been employed by a single organization for a considerable amount of time, if not their whole professional life. After all, they are admired for their tenacity and concentration, as well as their loyalty and dedication. All of these characteristics are ideal to have in a potential employee.
However, there are many who believe there is such a thing as having an excessive amount of staying power. “Longevity in a career has a lot of positive connotations, but there is also a fair degree of negative associated with it,” says Jamie McLaughlin, CEO of the New York-based recruiting company Monday Talent. “There are a lot of positive connotations regarding longevity in a role.”
Even while there are a number of advantages to having a longer history of experience – and lots of benefits that can come from sticking with one job for a long period of time – staying in the same position for an excessive amount of time can sometimes work against people. There is a “tipping point,” in the minds of some recruiters, at which they believe loyalty can potentially suggest complacency. And even for people who aren’t actively seeking employment, there may be other motivations to begin exploring one’s options after some time has passed.
The point of no return
It is a well-established fact that employees who have been with the same company for an extended period of time are more likely to be regarded favorably by management.
According to McLaughlin, it is a reflection of both competence and corporate loyalty. It is a safe bet that someone who has been successful in a position for a long time actually knows their stuff, and it is a sign that they have been there for a long time. In addition, it demonstrates that people have determined what they want to get out of a role, he adds.
However, there comes a point where remaining in the same position for an extended period of time can start to reflect adversely on a worker in the eyes of certain employers. It’s great that you’ve been married for eight, nine, or even 10 years, he says. “However, 15, 17, 19 years… there is a significant age gap there. I believe there is a time when the scales begin to tilt in one direction slightly more than the other. For example, staying in the same employment for such a lengthy period of time can indicate that one’s professional progress has come to a standstill or that workers have a smaller network.
According to McLaughlin, having experience in only one field or line of work can make a person appear one-dimensional. “If you’ve only been in one industry, in one business, it can make you a little bit ” “If I were in charge of hiring, one of the first questions I’d ask is, how diverse is their approach to learning and development? Is taking chances something they enjoy doing, or do they want to avoid it at all costs? Are they able to maintain their momentum? When you look at that, you could wonder how motivated the person in question is. Why haven’t they want to relocate all this time?”
Long-term employment can lead hiring managers to question an employee’s level of ambition, according to Claudia B. Kropf, who is vice president of human resources at the National Automobile Dealers Association in the United States and founder of the HR consultancy Monday’s Row. She feels that “the biggest disadvantage of remaining in a position for too long is getting comfortable with the status quo,” which could cause a prospective employer to worry that someone is too ingrained in the culture of one firm to quickly adjust to the culture of another organization.
McLaughlin asks, “If someone has been in the same place for fifteen to twenty years, you have to wonder if they have been institutionalized.” Do they simply make up a component of the furniture? How malleable are they, in all honesty? These questions, when coupled with preexisting biases regarding the inability of older workers to adapt to new environments, have the potential to be harmful.
There is no one right answer to the question of how human resources professionals and hiring managers evaluate long-tenured employees, as Kropf points out. These evaluations are purely subjective. According to her, “one person may perceive loyalty in 15 years of service or more, and another may see apathy in the same amount of time.” Therefore, it is likely up to the applicant to portray their lengthy employment not as a limitation, but rather as a strength in their application.
A few notable deviants from the norm
There are likely to be warning signs associated with seniority, but the number of years listed on a CV also has nuances that are buried within it.
For instance, having a lot of turnover inside a single firm can help minimize some of the drawbacks associated with not moving around very often. According to McLaughlin, “if you’ve been somewhere for 15 years, but you’ve moved up levels every couple of years, that’s like changing jobs.” [Citation needed] According to him, this makes it much more acceptable to have spent a significant amount of time working for the same organization because it indicates that you have gained a wide range of experience during that period of time. On the other side, he goes on to say that “if you’ve been somewhere for more than 15 years and you’ve had the same job title, that can be a worry, unless you’re at the very top of your game with nowhere else to climb.”
The sector in which a worker is employed can also be significant. Some career pathways do need staying in one place for ten years or more in order to accumulate the requisite tenure for promotion to a higher employment level. According to McLaughlin, “I don’t think there’s as much of a bad connotation if you’ve been somewhere for 10 or 15 years, gone up, and made partner. This is especially true if you’re an accountant or a lawyer.” That’s pretty much the path you have to take in order to succeed in those fields.
This is in stark contrast to, for example, creative professions, where he contends that switching jobs frequently is frequently the best way to advance one’s talents and open up new career choices. “When you switch from working for one firm or team to another, not only does your network change, but so does your customer base, your employer, and the learning and development opportunities available to you. You are presented with new responsibilities, new people, and new concepts.
In addition, according to Kropf, the world is in a state of perpetual change, and employees are required to remain current with emerging technologies in order to maintain their competitive edge. Workers whose professions do not adapt and allow them opportunities to learn new skills are at risk of falling behind.
The element that serves as recompense
Aside from the perceptions of hiring managers, staying in one position for an excessive amount of time can also have negative impacts on workers, notably regarding their salaries.
People don’t necessarily have to switch employers to see their pay progress at least somewhat; there are plenty of opportunities to gain bumps in pay while staying within a single organization as long as there is a culture of upward mobility. For many employees, this means that there are plenty of opportunities to gain bumps in pay while staying within a single organization. However, working at the same place for an excessive amount of time can potentially damage earning potential, even if it does not impede job-title advancement.
According to McLaughlin, personnel who receive regular promotions inside the same organization have the potential to climb the job title ladder just as quickly as individuals who move from one job to another. However, even if they are given regular pay hikes, remaining in the same position can result in a reduction in income. People in the United States who transferred employment saw, on average, close to 2 percent more annual wage rise than their previous coworkers who remained in their positions, according to a poll that was carried out in 2022 by the payroll business ADP.
This is especially true in light of the present tight labor market, in which employers are offering significant financial incentives to attract qualified applicants to work for their companies. Twenty percent of people who changed jobs during the pandemic saw a 10 percent to 20 percent pay increase, and nearly a third of those surveyed got an even bigger bump – making more than thirty percent more than they had been making before the pandemic. This information was gleaned from a survey conducted in 2022 by the research organization The Conference Board, which polled more than 2,600 workers in the United States. The pattern repeats itself in the UK, where workers who changed jobs also saw an increase in their pay.
One of the main reasons why so many people in nations like the United States and the United Kingdom – especially younger workers – are switching jobs rather than remaining loyal to their existing company is the availability of wage incentives like these.
Should I stay or should I go?
Despite everything that has been said, people shouldn’t necessarily panic and quit their stable positions just because of this new information. While there are a number of valid variables that go into determining whether staying put in a position is the best decision or not, it is essential that workers be satisfied in their jobs.
“If you found somewhere you love, and you’re comfortable there, and you feel like you’re looked after there, and you’re paid well and respected, you don’t need to move just for the sake of it,” says McLaughlin. “If you found somewhere you love, and if you’re comfortable there, and if you feel like you’re respected and paid well.”
But at the same time, it’s a smart idea to keep your eyes focused ahead of you. According to McLaughlin, if you’re getting close to the five-year mark, it’s important to take stock of where you are in life and investigate what other options may be available to you.
“That is really the criterion,” he says. “You want to make sure that your function has grown with your life.” “And approximately once every five years, you should be opening the door, simply to explore what your alternatives might be,” she continued. It’s not necessarily a sign that you’re dissatisfied with your current situation or want to switch careers just because you’re talking to other people. You’re just conducting due diligence on your career.”